Outrage over gun violence often skims over the fact that women are at high risk of being shot at work.
Groups like the HRC use diversity ratings to raise their profile, but they’re not worth the paper they’re printed on.
With social contractures comes a redefinition of what is ‘safe,’ and that hits creative people hard.
As we agonize over how to reach people who think differently than we do, maybe we should be talking about our own wrong thinking and changes of heart.
So a proposed policy looks sensible and helpful. Is it really? Here are some things to think about when evaluating policy proposals.
Violence against abortion providers is terrorism, full stop. The federal government’s pointed refusal to engage with it is not acceptable.
In times of social contraction, people of resort to exclusionary organising tactics. Uniting for the sake of the cause is the wrong approach.
If the only way you can criticise someone is through the use of -isms, check yourself. How does your rhetoric enforce injustice?
In 2016, California voters said they wanted to fast track the death penalty. How does one of the most progressive states in the union have the largest death row population, and, apparently, a thirst for capital punishment?
Celebrities frequently rush into social issues like they’re some kind of glorious gift to humanity. Along the way, they do a lot of damage. Is it really so hard to do some research before embarking on something?