Glee: Sexy

Wondering why this review is going up a week after the episode aired? You can complain to ATT and UPS about that1. So anyway, yes, here we are, clearing the decks for this week’s Glee, which apparently involves Regionals. I for one can hardly contain my excitement about having to watch Glee two days in a row. Look at my party hat. LOOK AT IT.

Last week on Glee, viewers learned that celibacy, while a ‘valid choice’ for teens, is actually just the result of frigidity and/or fear of sex. I’d heard that the episode featured asexuality, which it thankfully did not, because if there’s one thing Glee does badly, it’s pretty much everything, and I could have done without a horrific slew of stereotypes about asexuality. Instead they were just implied in the discussion about celibacy! Hooray.

‘Sexy’ appears to be The Very Special Sex Education Episode, which…well…let’s just say that it was handled absolutely as awfully as all the show’s other very special episodes. Whether we’re talking about a reinforcement of the idea that bisexuality doesn’t exist, shaming people for being ignorant about sexuality (Brittany is the show’s running joke for ‘hahaha look at the stupid blonde!’), or telling us that people who practice celibacy are naive, Glee made sure to make the topic of teen sexuality as titterworthy and unoriginal as possible, insulting teens copiously in the process.

I see Glee also decided to go the easy route with cheap shots at Southerners in the discussion about the lack of sexual education and ‘kids these days’ that served as the setting of the scene. Discussing a rash of teen pregnancies, Holly makes sure to reinforce that, you know, it is Tennessee. Oh, you backward Southerners and your lack of sex education and streets teeming with pregnant teens! Hardy har! Let’s all have a guffaw.

One could say that this episode was poking fun at the commonly held idea that sexual education is dangerous, and that exposing teens to actual information about sexuality will, of course, lead them down the path of sin. Except that it didn’t quite ring true to me, because the episode, as usual, was a hot mess.

I got the sense that we’re supposed to find the sexually active characters more sophisticated and aware than those who are not, as a general rule. Holly Holliday tells Puck and Lauren that she’s pleased to note how ‘comfortable they are in their bodies,’ like there are no obstacles to that (especially for fat teens) and people are are uncomfortable are that way because they’re, you know, frigid and scared of sex. Go them! Being all edgy!

Yet, the show’s Very Lonely and Very Damaged Sex Educator suggests that being sexually active and also knowledgeable is bad. Glee drew bright, shiny lines between sex and romance, shaming pretty much everyone in the process. If you don’t have sex, you’re a fool, if you do, you’re damaged goods doomed to relationship drama or an eternal search for romance that you will never be able to satisfy.

The show spent a lot of time making fun of people who choose celibacy, implying that they are ignorant and naive. Actually, it did more than implying by having Emma select ‘Afternoon Delight’ as the celibacy club’s anthem. Look at all the clueless frigid celibate people who are too stupid to know what that song is about! Naturally, no one chooses celibacy for informed reasons, no one who is celibate is educated about sexuality, and celibacy is rooted in ignorance and fear.

Emma, of course, was back in full force as the show’s OCD poster girl, who thinks sex is dirty and bad and gross because of her case of the crazy and the torch she still carries for Will. They really came down on hard that one, reiterating her distaste for sex repeatedly in a way that’s supposed to be funny, to viewers. I’m sure those lines were being played for laughs, given the rest of the way her character is played. We are, again, supposed to think she is funny because of the way the symptoms of her mental illness express themselves. Hahaha, she freaks out about sex and grapes!

Speaking of ableism, Holly Holliday appears to be the show’s ableism foil, judging from the content of pretty much every other line out of Gwyneth Paltrow’s mouth. Oh yes, Glee, you are so edgy and progressive! You are especially progressive when you make sure to tell us that wheelchair users can never have children, through Artie telling the glee club that he couldn’t imagine being a father when they think Brittany is pregnant and everyone finding the idea of Artie being a father highly humourous.

The serious sex talk between Kurt and his father felt ridiculous, even though I really don’t think it was meant to. The show has spent most of the episode belittling and mocking people who choose celibacy or choose to wait, and then tries to counteract that with the feelings talk and Kurt being told that he should wait to have sex until it’s right because he matters. Which is absolutely true, but Glee’s mixed messages of sarcasm, mockery, and serious business do not play nicely together and the show needs to stop trying.

Glee really needs to make up its mind. Either it can be a teen comedy, or it can be an after school special, but it cannot be both. The show’s messages constantly contradict each other and are, at time, dangerously wrong. For a show claiming to be exercising social responsibility and educating people, Glee is treading very perilous ground.

One more note: Glee, I’m pretty sure that if you have to autotune a capella, you’re doing it wrong.

  1. Short version, first ATT broke my Internet, and then UPS delivered the next day air package containing my new wireless gateway five days after it shipped. Yes, I am grumpy about this. Yes, I will continue to be grumpy about it until the end of time.

Google, Stop Distracting Me

In the search engine wars, Google quickly rose to the top of my list for one simple reason: Simplicity. Even as other search engines were turning towards portal-modeled content, Google clung to the front page, a simple search box with a search button, and returned simple, unadorned results. No features, no gimmicks. I know many people turned to Google for its search algorithm, which appears of dubious merit these days, but I turned to it because it was crisp, clear, and easy for me to navigate.

I have a really hard time with visual distractions. Anything that flashes or moves on a screen renders me nonfunctional until I close the page, which is a serious problem on an Internet where everyone and their sister seems to feel the need to include animations; whether it’s a bouncing mood icon or a flashing banner ad, it ruins my focus and concentration. Imagine looking at a page and only being able to see what is moving, even if it is very small or subtle. That’s basically what moving things do to me, which is why I am gnashing my teeth over the current animated .gif fad. The best way I can describe moving things is that they freeze my brain.

Cluttered layouts are also big pitfalls for me. I have a hard time seeing things in a confusing or unfamiliar layout, which means that I can scan a page a dozen times and not see the thing I want; I once spent 15 minutes trying to figure out how to start a new email in GMail because they changed the design of the ‘compose mail’ button and my brain just refused to see the new button. I rake pages with my eyes in increasing desperation, especially when people are watching or waiting for something, and I just cannot see what I am supposed to.

Which is why I like really simple things. I like one or two column blog formats. I like search engines that just give me a list of links with short excerpts. I like hidden menus that I can expand when I need to access, and ignore when I do not. I do not like options. I loathe those noxious social networking bars springing up like weeds on websites everywhere; I find them tremendously visually distracting, to the point that, again, they are the only thing I see on the page, which is annoying when I’m, you know, trying to read a news article.

All of this visual distraction makes it increasingly hard for me to navigate the Internet. One of the things I love about the newest incarnation of WordPress is the ability to collapse, customise, and hide. Most people would have a tough time navigating my dashboard because there’s nothing here. I have it stripped down to a bare minimum and I collapse most things so they don’t distract me. Something like a list of categories at the side of the window can send my brain on a tailspin; I start thinking about those things, focusing on them exclusively, wondering if I should reorganise them, and meanwhile the composition box remains blank. I need a very controlled and fundamentally spartan navigating environment.

Which is why Google is really pissing me off these days. I’ve ranted at length about the changes to search; the sidebars, site previews, and other additions that are not just annoying and unwanted for me, but render search fundamentally unusable. It’s not that it is hard for me to use or that I need to adjust, it’s that I cannot use it with those ‘functions’ enabled. I finally resorted to turning scripts off and blocking a bunch of stuff on Google search just so that I could use the damn Internet without my head exploding.

But the same tendency, to add on a bunch of unwanted and not really necessary crap, is exploding across Google properties, and it’s really annoying. Part of my loyalty to Google is the result of being tied to it in so many ways, but part of the reason I have allowed that to happen is because it historically had good aesthetics and a careful design consciousness. That included very basic and simple visuals, clear navigation and control, ease of use for me, as a disabled user. Now, that’s not the case. Google is filled with gewgaws and gadgets and the same problem is spread across the entire Internet; it’s not like I can go somewhere else to escape it because everywhere is like this.

There aren’t even options to choose a less visually distracting presentation mode, or to turn off unwanted ‘features’ that distract me. Meanwhile, Google takes away the features I actually use and want. For example, in search, you used to be able to X out results that were not relevant or useful. It would remember this and it would start to learn to not display those sites. Considering how much searching I do for work, this is a really key feature. I need to be able to clean up search results quickly and to work with an adaptive search engine that will learn from my habits to display what I want. Now that this feature is gone, it’s back to wading through irrelevant results to find what I need.

Google has a bad track record with suddenly releasing ‘features’ that users are not very enthusiastic about and then acting surprised when there are howls of rage from web browsers who are not happy. You would think they would learn from this and stop doing it, and that maybe it would consider things like testing and actually responding to criticism before releasing stuff to the general public. I cannot be the only disabled person in the entire world who has trouble navigating the Internet because of visual distractions and used to rely on Google to meet my need for clear, simple browsing. I want that Google back. I don’t much fancy this one.

Wide Wicker

Zach St. George at The Journal: Farmers Honked Off at Once-Cooked Goose

Distinguished from their bigger Canada cousins by their squatter features and the white ring at the base of their neck, the Aleutian Cackling Goose was among the first species put on the Endangered Species List in the 1960s.

Dan McGraw At Fort Worth Weekly: Let the Right Ones Out

In Texas 43 inmates have been exonerated, based on DNA tests, of the crimes that put them in prison — the most of any state in the country since 2000.

Chris Benjamin at The Coast: Moving targets

We know for sure that Vancouver is kicking our asses, that we are less sustainable than Mississauga, and that we are more sustainable than Hamilton, Quebec City and Winnipeg, by a nose hair.

Michael E. Miller at Miami New Times: Miami waiter Eddie Santana is a restaurant rebel

To fellow waiters, Eddie is an unlikely if not unlikable hero who calls out Miami restaurants on the hundreds of ways they steal from employees.

Jason Whited at Las Vegas City Life:  ‘So, a woman walks into a funeral …’

“At what other time would you want two Jewish mothers handling an event? At death, at a funeral, of course,” she says.