Guest Post from Andrea: Coming Home

This is a guest post from Andrea. Andrea lives in the backwoods of northern Virginia with a small menagerie, where she fritters her life away reading, hiking Civil War battlefields, and surfing the internet when the weather allows her primitive satellite connection to stay up.  She’s involved in social justice, battlefield preservation, and is foolish enough to try going to school full time while holding down a full time job that requires a 100 mile daily commute.  You can catch her blogging this idyllic life over at the Manor of Mixed Blessings (posts there have no redeeming social value).

For the past two years I’ve struggled with a feeling of being out of place. I thought I could find a home, as it were, in the feminist movement, but the more involved I got with it, the more I read, the more dissatisfied I became. There are deep failures in feminism, entrenched classism, racism, ableism, and an equally deep resistance to even acknowledging these problems, let alone working to fix them. Polite requests to use inclusive language and to caption video content are met with adolescent cries of “It’s too much woooork! I don’t wanna!” with no concern for the fact that the people being excluded by these practices are, in fact, other women, who are supposedly as welcome in feminism as any other woman.

The prescriptive feminism also alienated me. There was always someone standing ready to tell other women that we’re doing it wrong. If we shave our legs, we’re pandering to patriarchal beauty standards. If we don’t shave our legs, we’re pandering to anti-feminists who stereotype all feminists as hairy-legged lesbian man-haters. If we wear revealing clothing, we are reinforcing the rape culture; if we dress modestly (as I do) and cover our hair (as I do), we’re contributing to the rape culture and also oppressed, whether we admit it or not. There is no way to win, no place where feminists can sit down and have a discussion on the nuances of decisions without shouting and vilification coming into it.

Another problem with the social justice world in general, particularly the people who identify as on the left side of the political spectrum, is a deep contempt for the human beings on the right. They are derided using ableist language like “crazy,” discounted as stupid. Their deeply held religious beliefs, a source of comfort and strength to them, are mocked in varying degrees, from then-candidate Obama’s mild comment about people “cling[ing] to guns and religion” to supposedly progressive sites putting up religious music videos specifically to open them to the jeering of the commentariat.

And then we wonder why we can’t get a dialogue going. We wonder why the right reacts to us with fear and hatred, instead of looking for common ground. You’ll see a lot in the media about the rigid, reactionary world views and religious roots of the right, but I have yet to see anyone call out the left: we are as much to blame as anyone else in our refusal to admit that we do not have the only way to live. We are as much to blame as the right, do we really think they don’t hear us when we make cracks about “invisible friends” and call them stupid? We have no moral high ground.

All of these things came together, more and more, as I searched for an ideological and spiritual home. I wanted a movement, an ideology, a spirituality if you will that encouraged and challenged me in my struggle to do better, to overcome my own limitations and privileges, to reach beyond the kyriarchical structures I was raised in. The social justice community and the feminist community in particular were not doing that, instead enabling people to stay in their comfort zones and avoid reaching out to anyone different, even the other people working for social justice.

It was after much reading, thought, and yes, prayer, that I came to the Religious Society of Friends, who most know as the Quakers. It felt like home to me, with an emphasis on community, on acting out of love, on being open, and on stillness and waiting for the small still Voice to speak. It calls on us to recognize that everyone equally has the Light of God within us, and therefore we must treat all people with respect, kindness, compassion, and love. The Quakers have a long history of social justice work across the spectrum; few people realize that the phrase “speaking truth to power” came from the Quakers, but many have appropriated it since.

Here at last I feel like I’ve found a home, a place where I am supported in the assertion that “none of us is free until all of us are free.” Here at last is a place where I feel supported as I try to grow, rather than feeling as if I must actively struggle against the tide to reach out to others. And here, finally, is a reaction to and a cure for the pain I felt at the restrictiveness of prescriptive feminism, in Quakerism’s emphasis on listening to the small, still, Voice and following its leadings, in its acknowledgement that we each of us walk an individual path and what is right for me may not be right at all for you. It made sense of my deep conviction that I needed to dress modestly and to cover my hair, these were leadings to set my feet on the path God wanted me to walk. They are integral to my personal faith, although not to the Quaker faith in general, as they remind me to speak and act with love and openness, to reach out to other human beings no matter their beliefs in humility. It’s difficult, I’ll admit it, I’m no saint and probably never will be. I will stumble sometimes, as we all do, but the important thing is that I pick myself up and go on, and trust that the grace will be given me to do what I am meant to do.

The decision to speak out to the wider world about my convincement was more difficult, because of the reasons I mentioned above. The social justice progressives will forgive you nearly anything except a deeply held religious belief, and heaven forfend you actually practice a religion rather than merely admitting to a vaguely held belief system. I knew that it would make me even more unwelcome in certain leftie circles, that it would open me to the sting of the gratuitous and cruel mockery that happens when religion gets brought up. But it was the way I was led, and so here I am in my long skirts and with my head covered, to tell you that I have finally come home.

The Jasmine Project: Fair Weather Friends

Watching jasmine grow is considerably more exciting than watching paint dry, right? For those unfamiliar with it, I started the jasmine project when I put in several jasmine vines last summer, to track their growth. The goal is to eventually cover the fence between the neighbour’s house and mine so we don’t have to look at each other all the time, and to create at least the illusion that I am not surrounded on all sides by people.

The last of the decent weather is winding down, after a summer that didn’t really have much good weather to begin with. We got a burst of sunny and nice days after the equinox, but the shortening is upon us, which means the jasmine is probably going to start going into dormancy pretty soon.

North: A tangle of jasmine vines and flowers in the shade.

The plant to the north is growing a number of long tendrils and it’s also starting to branch out, making the start of a dense wall of greenery. Not dense enough for my tastes just yet, but hopefully soon…

Middle: Clusters of jasmine flowers hang in front of a trellis.

The plant in the middle is still merrily flowering away. Some days, I can smell the jasmine, which is very exciting, and infinitely preferable to Other Odours that drift through the windows.

Under the Peach: Jasmine vines and flowers at the top of a trellis, the sun looming in the background.

‘Under the peach’ is starting to seem like a bit of a misnomer, isn’t it?

South: Jasmine buds, seen through the trellis.

The plant to the south is still looking a little burned, although this particular shoot is in good shape.

Looking North: Jasmine flowers in focus in the foreground, a tangle of green in the background.

Another view of the tree under the peach, which is doing very well!

Elated Skinks

Ben Joravsky and Dave Glowacz at Chicago Reader: Filed Away?

This meant they suited Huberman and the Board of Education, which on June 15 passed a resolution giving him the power to circumvent the rights the CTU had negotiated for tenured teachers and give teachers the boot in the name of “cost savings measures implemented to address financial exigencies.”

Pam Zubeck at Colorado Springs Independent: As demands mount for unmanned missions, AFA launches drone training

One wrote, “There is a great deal of debate about if those UAV pilots will ever be released from that career path, even the active duty getting the UAVs wonder how long they will fly by remote control.”

Ellen Meany at The Isthmus: Sticking with tobacco

Today there are fewer than 100 tobacco growers in Wisconsin, down from thousands just 20 years ago. More than half the growers are in Dane County, still the state’s tobacco king.

Paul Rubin at Phoenix New Times: Pinalcchio: Renowned Forensics Experts Say a Pinal County Deputy’s High-Profile Tale About Getting Shot After Encountering Drug Smugglers Doesn’t Add Up

The timing of the desert shooting couldn’t have been better for Sheriff Babeu — “ironic,” one of his lieutenants says, tongue not in cheek.

Rebekah L. Cowell at Indyweek: What rights do undocumented immigrants have when they become crime victims?

That’s not how it works: 87 percent of all individuals picked up in participating counties in North Carolina were booked on infractions of driving without a license, which they cannot legally obtain, according to the Latino Migration Project‘s latest report.

Private Practice: What In the !@$#)(!?

I’m always talking up Private Practice as a great show that tends to cover issues pretty well; I’m particularly fond of the fact that, for example, the wheelchair user on the show is a full time wheelchair user in real life, and in an episode in a prior season involving an intersex child, Addison refused to surgically alter the child without consent. It seems like the show actually consults people in the groups it depicts and works to make depictions honest, interesting and engaging.

Which is why I was so horrified last night while I was watching ‘Short Cuts.’ There were two main medical storylines in the episode; one involving an autistic child, and one involving a trans woman getting ready for bottom surgery with Charlotte. Both were handled so atrociously that I was forced to radically reevaluate my position on the show. So, good work, Sonay Washington, you managed to flush three years of good work down the tubes.

When we are introduced to the autistic child, he is classic, stereotypic, TV autistic—he’s vocalising in grunts and squeaks and self injuring and everyone talks around and about him instead of to him. It transpires that his mother has been using her medical marijuana prescription to literally dope him up. Pete supports this, Cooper doesn’t, and we have a nice brisk argument about curing autism, culminating with a home visit by Pete where we are treated to a teary lecture from the mother on how awful it all is and how Pete has no idea how hard caregiving is. The takeaway here is that having an autistic child is soooooo hard and will give you The Crazy, as the show seems to be depicting the mother in a way that is suggestive of mental illness.

Cooper and Pete decide that marijuana is not an appropriate treatment for autism and this ‘forces’ the mother to get some weed on the street. Said weed, of course, happens to be paced with PCP, so we get a bathos-laden hospital scene with the kid reacting badly to the PCP and the mother being dragged away by police, screaming ‘but I’m his mooooother!’

There is so much wrong with this, I don’t even know where to begin. With ‘autism as life sentence for misery,’ perhaps? With ‘parenting a child with autism is impossible,’ maybe? With ‘single mothers just can’t handle autism’? With the grossly caricaturised depiction of autism? I don’t even know. It left me really unhappy and profoundly unimpressed, especially since the show has been really good on disability issues in the past. It was also yet another example of the really questionable depictions of parenting and motherhood on this show and I think some of the show’s creative team might want to choose another venue for processing their mother-hate.

The plotline with the trans woman could have been an honest depiction of how medical gatekeeping of transition harms members of the transgender community, but I suspect that’s not the takeaway viewers will be left with. What I saw, watching Jane try to clear psych so she could get approved for surgery, was a woman who couldn’t access the treatment she needed because of transphobia and bigotry on the part of the medical establishment, Sheldon high on his power. I suspect that what a lot of viewers saw was the old ‘but how can they really know their gender?’

And, of course, the episode culminates with Sheldon refusing to clear her for surgery, and a dramatic scene in her home where she mutilates her genitals to force Charlotte to operate on her. Then, touching recovery scene in the hospital where she realises she really needs counseling from Sheldon. See, she really was in pain and Sheldon was right to refuse to clear her for surgery! The end!

Seriously, Private Practice? Seriously? This is why I hate the vast majority of depictions of transgender people on television, because you use us like props for convenient plots. You really wanted to knock ‘the transgender episode’ off your bucket list and by gum, you did.

You’d better bring it next week, or you’re off my subscriptions and recommendation lists.