The 2010 Census

I have been seriously slacking up putting up photos from old magazines, and for that I apologise. I have tons of them, I just have not had very much energy lately.

But, today, a special treat!

The 2010 Census form, which I found wedged into my gate when I came home from errands. Because the only thing better than participating in data collection…is blogging about participating in data collection, right?

My envelope from the US Census, sitting on a bookcase. The address is obscured by my purse. US CENSUS can be seen at the top of the envelope, with address information in the upper left corner. On the lower left, a notice says: 'US Census Form Enclosed: Your Response Is Required By Law'First things first: The envelope, please! Note that ominous black box warning.

The contents of my Census packet. On the upper left, the Census form. The upper left is the notice about the Census, and on the bottom, the return envelope.

The letter from the Census says:

March 15, 2010

A message from the Director, US Census Bureau…

This is your official 2010 Census form. We need your help to count everyone in the United Stated by providing basic information about all the people living in this house or apartment. Please complete and mail back the enclosed Census form today.

Your answers are important. Census results are used to decide the number of representatives each state has in the US Congress. The amount of government money your neighborhood receives also depends on these answers. That money is used for services for children and the elderly, road, and many other local needs.

Your answers are confidential. This means the Census Bureau cannot give out information that identifies you or your household. Your answers will only be used for statistical purposes, and no other purpose. The back of this letter contains more information about protecting your data.

The Census form. Demographic information requested: The number of people in my house, whether I own/rent, my name, my phone number, my sex, my age, my birthdate, whether or not I identify as someone of Hispanic origin, my race, whether or not I stay somewhere else sometimes.

This was it. I was really kind of disappointed. In 2000 we had a long form which had many delicious fields to fill out. This year, this was all. The form folds out so that you can fill out demographic data about other people in the household as well. Assuming you have other people in your household. Which I do not. Over at Feministe, frau sally benz wrote about the questions on Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish origin versus race: Latinos Are Post-Racial! Booyah!

The start of the section on the Census form for "person two," asking name, relationship to person one, and sex.

I thought this was interesting to note; this is the section of the form which would be filled out for a second person in the household. There was a lot of concern about how people in same sex marriages should identify on the Census since the Federal government does not recognize same sex marriages. Here I see “husband or wife” as an option. So, if you’re gaymarried, why, that’s the box you’d check! Also of note: The same options repeat across the form for up to six people (there’s also space for brief details on six more), so if one was in a polygamous marriage, one could also declare that! Likewise, there’s room for folks in poly/group relationships who are sharing the same house with “unmarried partners.” I’m sure the Census didn’t mean it this way…

The cool thing about Census forms is that the information is kept. So even if the Census adjusts gaymarried folks to “unmarried partners,” their answers as husbands and wives will live on.

A handwritten note on my Census form, reading: 'Dear US Census--Y'all are supercool, but I would really love to see 'gender,' not sex, on the Census form. Since it's not, I'm telling you now--I'm genderqueer. Thanks! s.e. smithI am incapable of filling out forms with irritating fields without adding editorial commentary. Consequently, I added this note to my Census form:

Dear US Census—Y’all are supercool, but I would really love to see ‘gender,’ not sex, on the Census form. Since it’s not, I’m telling you now—I’m genderqueer.

Thanks! s.e. smith

This really cheesed me off. One way to collect accurate statistics on trans* folks in the United States would be to collect demographic data about us on the Census. I realise that the Census has limited space, but the missed data opportunity here makes me want to cry. As does the implied assumption that sex=gender. I had a tough time when I got to that part of the form. Forms are hard. Anyway, the Census people do examine the forms by hand, so my note will be seen. I’d encourage other trans* people who feel comfortable doing so to note their gender identity on the form and/or to include a polite request asking that “sex” and “gender” not be conflated on future Censuses.

The inner flap of the Census response envelope, with a note reading 'Thank you for participating in the 2010 Census.'

You’re welcome! Although I was required to by law so I would have done it anyway.

The Unbearable Smallness of Technology

The watchword in technology development seems to be size, the smaller, the better. It has been for a long time; look at how congratulatory we are about the fact that computers have gone from being things which fill entire rooms to gadgets which can be stuck in the pocket. This aspect of the great race to the smallest size possible is kind of exciting; the fact that technology is constantly being refined and improved is rather amazing because I keep thinking that we will get to the end of the line and the point of no return and we don’t. The bar just keeps moving in terms of what we are capable of designing. It is kind of neat to look at things even from a few years ago and to see the very palpable difference, which is evidence of how quickly we are progressing.

But there’s another aspect to this which doesn’t seem to be getting a lot of attention and that’s that there is a big disability issue going on here. Smaller is not necessarily better for some disabled users of technology. I’m thinking of people who lack fine motor control, people with tremors, people with nerve damage, missing fingers, frozen fingers, arthritis. The list goes on. There are lots of people who have trouble working with very small things, is what I am driving at.

For us, the more things downsize, the more frustrating it becomes. I can barely use a lot of cellphones because the buttons are too close together. I mash them, I can’t feel the differences between them because my fingertips are not very sensitive, and I end up punching one thing when I mean to hit a completely different button. I can’t use touchscreen navigation at all because it’s either oversensitive and my tremors send it jiggering all about, or it’s not sensitive enough and I am afraid of breaking it because I can’t quite tell where my fingers end and the phone begins; imagine holding an egg in your hand but not really being able to tell how firmly you are holding it.

No, really. Imagine holding an egg and knowing that there is an egg in your hand, but not really being able to tell where the egg is. You can feel it, vaguely. Imagine trying to close your hand around an object when you cannot fix or locate the object in relation to your hand. Now, imagine doing that with a jerk or tremor; you may think you have control but your fist could clamp shut at any minute, and then all you have is a broken egg.

Netbooks, which were all the rage for a while, are pretty much impossible for me to use because the keyboard is too crowded. I run into the problem, again, of mashing keys together and of not knowing where my hands are in relation to the keyboard. Things like Blackberries are just beyond my capability. I tried to type on one once and it was like trying to thread an embroidery needle with one of the cables on the Golden Gate Bridge. Not. Gonna. Happen.

Even using full sized equipment, I make rampant typos, as anyone who  has seen me type in real time can testify. Those typos are usually the result of keys being closer together than I think they are. My hand strays, my finger splays, and words start sprouting extra letters or letters I meant to touch are nowhere to be seen while there’s a string of other characters that don’t belong. I’m pretty good about weeding them out, although a few sneak through anyhow and later I sigh and go back and fix them.

This is not because I’m not a proficient typist or because I wasn’t taught how to type. It is because my hands have trouble with keyboards. This does not make me a failure, it just means that I have to be careful about which products I buy so that I know I can use them. I don’t test keyboards for feel of the keys, I test them to see whether or not my hands can fit. To make sure that the keys are separate and different enough that I will probably hit the right ones most of the time. To confirm that my frozen right pinkie finger is not constantly going to jam up against the enter key and cause problems. (Since the enter key happens to be the key which, you know, executes commands, it is kind of critical that I not hit it by accident.)

For me, the increasingly smaller size of technology is a big problem. I’ll be replacing my cell phone soon, when I switch carriers, and I am very worried about my options. The only cell phones that appear designed for people who have trouble with small buttons are also designed for people who are not very technologically savvy, because they are designed for older adults and for some reason technology designers seem to think that older adults do not know how to use technology.

My grandmother is a software developer. She can run circles around me on pretty much every computer or program ever designed. She can take software which is completely not intuitive in any way and understand it in under five minutes. She can out-gadget pretty much anyone I know and she does. So don’t tell me that older technology users do not know how to use technology or are confused by it in some way. Some just needs things to be a bit larger because they have arthritis or tremors or visual impairments and it’s hard to use things which are teeny-tiny.

And don’t tell me that disabled and older users of technology don’t deserve the full suite of features that one might reasonably expect. Just design a phone that’s a bit bigger, with larger buttons that I can actually hit, which has all the features that the smaller phone has. That’s all I’m asking for, is something a bit larger which will be comfortable and functional for me as a user.

Piquant Morays

Letters of Note: Send cask arsenic exterminate aborigines

This shocking 1907 telegram was sent by a Charles Morgan to Henry Prinsep, a man seemingly based 2200km away in Perth who at the time was, surprisingly, Chief Protector of Aborigines for Western Australia.

Annaham at FWD/Forward: Yeah, what *about* your free speech “rights”?

Perhaps they think that the First Amendment entitles them to say whatever they want without also getting called on it.

Jeffrey C. Billman at the Philadelphia City Paper: The New Normal

And that’s why we should pass the bill, no matter its shortcomings.

(I disagree. Vehemently. But you already know that. But at least he’s exploring some decent arguments here. And not claiming that this bill will magically provide access to health care for everyone, which, newsflash in case you haven’t figured this out: This bill will not provide access to health care to a lot of people.)

Katharine Biele at the Salt Lake City Weekly: LDS Church & SLC Development

Plans are afoot to get a long-awaited master plan in gear for a proposed settlement that would permanently change the face of this urban capital.

Erin Sullivan at the Baltimore City Paper: A Pattern of Failure

A pair of bills before the General Assembly this session–HB 962 and SB 757–seek to amend the state’s criminal code to make child neglect a felony in the state of Maryland.

Ashley at Small Strokes Fell Big Oaks: “Activism” Can Ruin Lives

…off-the-cuff, reactionary sort of activism that tends to start with people who are understandably upset about a cause with valid arguments and then they invite everyone in the world to join their cause – many of them just wanting to feel like they are a part of something.

This type of “activism” is, unfortunately, not limited to Facebook. It’s a big problem and I’m glad to see people writing about it.