• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary content (sidebar)
  • Thursday Night Good Housekeeping

    Time for a trip in the wayback machine to September, 1954, when Good Housekeeping cost .35c and children with rosy cheeks were on the covers of national magazines.

    Hamilton ad; click through to read full image scription, including transcription of text.

    Hamilton ad; click through to read full image description, including transcription of text.

    Clearly aimed at laundry converts. And I hate doing laundry, so, you know. If I could fit a washer and dryer in my house I would sit around in pedal pushers while I did the laundry too.

    Whirlpool washer ad; click through to read a full description, including transcription of text.

    Whirlpool washer ad; click through to read a full description, including transcription of text.

    Another washer ad. This one I find interesting because I am used to thinking of the 1950s as a kind of profligate era when no one thought about the environment, and this ad heavily stresses saving water. (Possibly from a moneysaving perspective rather than an environmental one, though.) I was also intrigued by the reference to “delicate modern fabrics,” since I thought the whole point of modern fabrics was to avoid the delicacy issue.

    Johnson and Johnsons Baby Shampoo ad; click through to read a description, including a transcript of the text

    Johnson and Johnson's Baby Shampoo ad; click through to read a description, including a transcript of the text

    You can use this on babies in addition to cats? I’ll have to keep that in mind.

    Tags: , ,

    4 Comments

    1. Aside from both environmental and financial concerns, do remember the 1950s was coming right out of the war era, where conservation of all strategic resources – metal, water, food, gasoline, electricity – was taken as a matter of course. The mentality was waning then, but I suspect was still active enough to be used as an advertising strategy.

    2. Right, I think I’ve been watching too much Mad Men, so I am in the mindset of 1960s profligacy. Waste it! Waste more!

    3. Those butterfly chairs are so damn uncomfortable. Bleh.

    4. I’ve never been able to wedge myself into one in a way which makes sense. But, I guess that’s bodily variation for you; people somewhere must fit in them and like ‘em, because they sure are popular!