Book 285: Golden Bats and Pink Pigeons

Every now and then, I am reading a book by an author who has passed away, and I think “man, this guy is dead. That’s really weird. He’s dead, yet he’s talking to me.” And then I get over it and keep reading. Does this happen to anyone else? If it does, I would feel ever so much better.

At any rate, this is a book in the considerable offerings of Gerald Durrell, naturalist extraordinaire. In this volume, he chronicles traveling to Mauritius to rescue golden bats and pink pigeons. And also some reptiles. But to me, the most interesting part was the chapter where he described snorkeling in the reef. His descriptions were vivid and totally fascinating, and they made me feel like I was swimming along with him. I like authors that are able to do that.

Reading sections like that, I can see why Durrell inspired a whole generation of naturalists. The book makes you want to hop on a plane and do something to fix the world before it gets any more broken, and I like that in an author too, the ability to inspire and engage readers, and to draw them out from under the covers, as it were.

Demographics:

Golden Bats and Pink Pigeons, by Gerald Durrell. Published 1977, 161 pages. Biography/nature.

Something About Sarah

I’ve been thinking a lot about Sarah Palin lately, in that way that I read reports about her and cringe, thinking that she is actually being advanced as a serious candidate for the position of Vice President of the United States. I can’t help but view her as a gimmick, a last-ditch effort, not a genuine candidate, and it seems that a lot of people feel the same way.

Which brings me to a topic I have been hesitant to approach, which is the treatment of Sarah Palin in the media, and in blogs, including sites that I normally think of as pretty progressive. Because, quite frankly, she is receiving some unbelievably sexist treatment, and it infuriates me. It also infuriates me to see the Republicans just discovering feminism, and calling people sexist when they question her qualifications or making legitimate comments about her fitness to serve, because it makes it that much harder to address sexism about Palin in the media.

If you want to attack Sarah Palin, fine, have at it. There’s plenty of ammunition, from her lack of qualifications to her obvious corruption. I’m also fine with involving her family, since families are very much a part of the political arena, and she’s used her family as a political tool, which means that it is fair game.

But I am sick and tired of seeing Sarah Palin attacked because of her gender.

Calling Sarah Palin “Caribou Barbie” is sexist. Referring to her looks is sexist. Making fun of her hairstyle, accent, and fashion is classist, but it also smacks of sexism (e.g. “women in politics should dress/act more fashionably”). Depicting her in a sexualized relationship with McCain is sexist. Even referring to her as a gimmick, as I did above, is kind of sexist, although I argue that if the Republicans had chosen an inexperienced and corrupt male governor from a state with a tiny population, I would call him a gimmick too.

Clearly the Republicans are terrified of letting Palin out of their control, not so much because she is a woman but because she is clearly not ready for this. Inevitably, the tight control of Palin’s appearances has led to comparisons with a delicate lily or a shrinking violet, and some commentators have suggested that the Republicans are being sexist by keeping her from us. I don’t think they’re being sexist, I think they’re just trying to exercise damage control before this whole thing blows up in their faces, and that would be true of any clearly inadequate candidate chosen in a petulant fit by a nominee who has no self control and is known for impulsiveness. But the situation feeds the sexism, and the accusations of sexism from the Republicans as the media chafes at not being given any access to her.

Sarah Palin is about a lot more than her gender, although the Republicans certainly made a sexist decision in picking her as a candidate solely because of her gender. Yes, she appeared in beauty pageants. Yes, she has a figure which is considered conventionally attractive. But these things have no bearing on her ability to serve the United States.

You know what does? Her experience, her beliefs, and her politics. So stop calling her Caribou Barbie, stop making fun of her because she was a beauty queen, and start focusing on the real issues, like the fact that Palin has totally distracted people from McCain, and his very real, very scary, and very alive political views. Focus on the fact that she is part of a crazed Christian sect that performs baptisms to protect people from witchcraft. Focus on the fact that she is obviously clueless, at sea in a world she doesn’t understand, and barely keeping her head above water. And, yes, focus on the fact that she is next in line for the Presidency, and that if something happens to McCain, she is clearly not prepared to take control of Washington, which means that she is going to turn into a puppet president at the mercy of the GOP, which may be, cynically, everything the GOP wants.

Palin is going to get creamed on Thursday not because she is a woman, but because she isn’t ready for this. And that, in a way, is a huge shame for women in the Republican party, because it will make it that much harder for another woman to climb that high in the party ranks. Choosing Sarah Palin actually put women a step backwards. Far from shattering the class ceiling, it added an extra layer by creating a figure of ridicule and uselessness who is going to be blamed if McCain loses because she was a woman, not because she was a crappy candidate.

Rattled Waffle Weave

ROTC programs are banned from the Columbia campus as long as Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell is in effect. I happen to think that’s totally awesome, and would love to see more so-called progressive universities (ahem, Berkeley) follow suit, because Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, is stupid, bigoted, barbaric, and outdated.

Hezbollah Tofu is my new favourite veggie blog. (For those of you who don’t get the reference, it’s a dig at Anthony Bourdain, fat-phobic anti-vegan asshole extraordinaire, who calls vegans the “Hezbollah-like splinter faction” of vegetarians.)

Speaking of Hezbollah, a fatwa has been issued against Pakistain’s President Zardari for, uhm, flirting with Sarah Palin. Link goes to video so that you can see the shameful flirtation for yourself.

Joseph Stiglitz sat down for an interview with LA CityBeat, and he’s got some great thoughts on the economy, the war, and the World Bank.

Planned Parenthood decided it was time to actively enforce the Bubble Law, and go after the pathetic sad-sacks who picket clinics.

Mental problems associated with military service are more likely to end in discharge than in help these days, in part because the DOD wants to underplay the skyrocketing rates of PTSD and traumatic brain injuries coming out of Iraq and Afghanistan.

Philip Pullman has some thoughts on censorship he would like to share with you.

Snow! On Mars. I am excited. Shut up, Tristan.

Book 284: Meet Me in the Parking Lot

This collection of short stories revolves around two themes: vehicles, and troubled people. Even though the themes are very much present in all of the stories, they are not obtrusive or obvious, and it might take a reader the whole book to catch on if he or she didn’t read the give-away on the back cover. I’ve actually read the book before, and since I maintain a policy of not reading about books before I read them, I got to discover the themes for myself. But now you can’t, because I spoiled it.

I am a bad person.

At any rate, many of the stories in this book have a very rough, unfinished feel, almost as though they are segments of larger stories. I can’t decide if I like this, in that it creates an interesting dynamic and an intriguing level of tension, or whether it pisses me off, because, you know, the stories feel unfinished. You are pretty much always left wondering about what is going to happen to the characters.

I think that I sort of like it, because it allows me to take the story to its next step. I like authors who let readers explore their characters and play with them a bit, rather than others who lay everything out all neatly like the last scene of a Shakespeare comedy. Why wrap a story up when you can leave readers feeling totally disoriented?

All of the characters in this book are very messed up, but they are also very different, which showcases Leggat’s range very nicely. I didn’t feel bored or restless, as I sometimes do in short story collections, because everything was fresh and crisp. For that alone, this book is worth liking.

Demographics:

Meet Me in the Parking Lot, by Alexandra Leggat. Published 2004, 163 pages. Fiction.

Post No Bail

Look. I’m not even going to pretend that I understand the economic crisis, because I don’t. I’m pretty sure you need to be an economist to fully figure out what is going on, and when it comes to money, the only thing I am really good at is spending it. But I would like to make a few comments about this whole situation, since it seems to be a pretty big topic of interest, and with good reason.

Basically, the way I understand the economic crisis is that a bunch of people got very greedy, and eventually their greed caused the market to topple. I am fully aware that this is an extremely simplistic view, and that a lot of other factors contributed, like a lack of oversight and regulation which might have brought that greed into check.

I don’t think there’s anything inherently wrong with being greedy, in that I understand the motivation although I personally find the behavior repugnant. But what does piss me off is that all of these people were really greedy, and now they want us to clean up after them. I say, if you eat a bunch of cookies and you vomit, you get to clean it up. I am not responsible for your bad choices. And I am certainly not going to pay a cleaning service out of my pocket to clean up your vomit.

And that’s why I am opposed to a bailout in any shape or form. Yes, I am aware that by failing to prop up our markets, times will get really unpleasant for a lot of people, probably including me, not just the greedy arses who are behind the crisis. But, the fact is that our economy is fundamentally broken, and I really think that we do need to allow it to collapse before we can try to rebuild it. We need to be sinking funds into public works programs, a la WPA, not giving money to companies which were too irresponsible to manage their funds the first time around. We need to be investing in the American people as a collective, not Wall Street.

After all, millions of Americans are expected to handle their own debt and financial crises. It’s harder than ever to declare bankruptcy, even when you have extenuating circumstances like extraordinarily high medical bills or sudden job loss. Why is it that when Americans are in financial trouble, through their own inability to manage finances or not, they lose their homes and are hounded by credit agencies, but when American companies have financial problems, they get a free handout from the government? Why is that fiscally responsible Americans are punished, while reckless individuals are given free reign? I don’t quite understand why this is, and I would love to have it explained.

I don’t seem to be the only American who feels this way, which makes me hope that maybe things will turn out differently. As I was saying to the debate watching crew on Friday, bailing out these firms is like painting over a moldy wall. It’s a quick fix, but it doesn’t resolve the fundamental problem, and that mold is going to keep bubbling up over and over again.

I feel like we are being pressured into a quick fix by Wall Street and the Republicans, and that if we go through with this, we are going to regret it. And now just us, but future generations of Americans. Growing up in this country is already pretty difficult. Do we really need to make it worse? Make no mistake, a blank check for firms that screwed up is going to deprive children of education, it’s going to deprive useful government agencies of funds they need, it’s going to increase our budget deficit and national debt by amounts I can’t even begin to imagine, it’s going to deprive troops on the ground of the tools they need. It’s not going to fix the basic issues in this country. America needs to learn fiscal responsbility in order to counter financial crisis, and that’s not going to happen with a bailout and a patronizing lollypop. Let this canker eating away at American society rot, I say. We must be cruel in order to be kind.

UPDATE, 12:03 PM: Apparently the House agrees with me. The question is, what happens now?

Thawed U-Bends

The United States isn’t the only place with a government which tries to shove scientific information under the carpet.

They may have met with Palin, but foreign leaders seemed to have a lot of kind words for Biden.

More problems in Afghanistan: a high-ranking female police official was just assassinated by the Taliban.

Electronic voting should scare your pants off.

Heroin on the rise in Milwaukee. Could heroin start getting big again elsewhere?

Ooops, says the SEC.

Book 283: Leg the Spread

Given the current trials and tribulations of the markets, I thought it might be nice to re-read Leg the Spread, a book about a woman who braved the Boys Club of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange. It’s a fascinating book not only because it provides insight into the culture of commodities trading, but also because it’s very revealing about trading in general, and how male-dominated this career continues to be.

As Lynn points out, the ability to trade at home is shifting the face of this industry, by allowing people to basically conceal their identities behind computer screens. She documented the sexism she experienced at the floor of the Merc, and the differences in how she was treated depending on whether or not the trader she was working for was present. Sexual harassment is routine, and female traders have a very hard time making a go of it.

It’s a world where sums of money which are truly mindboggling flare and vanish in an instant, where a single error can result in the loss of millions of dollars. Certainly not a world I would like to be involved in, but the culture of this world explains a lot about the world we live in today.

Demographics:

Leg the Spread, by Cari Lynn. Published 2004, 320 pages. Biography.

Book 282: Misconceptions

I picked this book up at the library because I am very intrigued by the nature of motherhood in the United States, and since all of my friends seem to be breeding these days, I thought it might have some insight which would be helpful. Obviously reading a book is not a replacement for real-world experience, and you’d be kidding yourself if you thought it was, but I think it can still be valuable.

The main flaw with this book is the same flaw which runs through all of Wolf’s work: it’s about a very limited set of experiences. Now, she admits this, but I really think it weakens her usefulness and applicability as an author. By reading only about yuppie mothers, I felt rather shortchanged, and I really think she should have tried harder to talk to a larger cross-section of women. Oh, sure, she had brief nods to “women of color” and women in lower social classes, but this book seemed extremely self-centered and very vain, almost as though only the experiences of middle class women matter.

Looking beyond that, it seems like the sort of book which would be good for an expecting mother to read, because there’s a lot of information in it, and a lot of debunking of conventional knowledge. I especially liked the discussion at the end about parenting negotiations, and her realization that even in feminist families, the men somehow manage to take priority when it comes to which career is more important, which parent stays home, whether or not the family relocates.

I’d say that Misconceptions laid the groundwork for understanding a specific type of motherhood, and for that, it was valuable, but as a whole it was a kind of disappointing experience. I guess Naomi Wolf has become wildly popular because she happens to belong to the same social class she writes for. She writes about yuppies, and yuppies read her. The rest of us are sort of out in the cold.

Demographics:

Misconceptions, by Naomi Wolf. Published 2001, 340 pages. Parenting.

Paying for College

A number of my mentees (some of whom are in the pages of this very blog!) are off to college, which is quite exciting. Go mentees! (Both returning college students and first-timers.) But college application time is gearing up yet again, and for some reason, I often get asked to give advice on college applications, and specifically on how to get financial aid. I’m not sure quite why this is, since I don’t think I look like the sort of person who knows about all the sweet financial aid deals, although I have applied to a lot of colleges (and gotten into a fair number too), so I guess I have some experience there. And when I went to [East Coast College], the tuition for a year was more than the combined net worth of my father and I, plus around three years of income, so obviously I know a bit about financial aid, and how to work it.

And while I love talking to people about how to go to college, I often find myself repeating the same information, year after year. So I’ve decided to write a two-part guide on paying for college, and writing college applications. Now, there are a lot of these kinds of things out there, and this guide comes from personal experience in a more free and happy economic time (read: before Bush had a chance to totally destroy the economy), so some of the information may be dated, but I think it’s pretty solid. More importantly, I hope that it’s helpful, and I encourage people to ask questions in the comments or to email me if they’re shy.

College is pretty expensive. And I think that’s a major barrier to a lot of poor/middle class people, because they think it’s insurmountable. But I’m going to tell you the same thing my father told me when I was applying to college: money is not an obstacle. It might look like one, but if you really want it, you can go to whatever college you want (even if you don’t get in on the first try, which is a matter for the second half of this series). Never let someone tell you that you can’t afford college. Especially if you’re poor, or if you’re the first person in your family to go to college, or you are disabled, or you are a minority. If you’re in one of these groups, you should be able to basically get paid to go to college. (No joke. When I was going to school at [East Coast College], I used to walk up to the billing office with my ludicrously rich friend who paid his tuition by check while I picked up my free money. Free as in not loans money, as in a stipend the college paid me, per semester, just for being poor.)

Now, when I went to school, the government was basically handing out money. That’s not the case anymore, but there are still some ways to work the financial aid system to get as much as you possibly can. And I want everyone who wants to go to college to be able to do it. Money is no excuse for missing out on an education (and lots of parties which, in retrospect, will seem really awful).

My first tip is: start early. If you’re low-income or middle class, you can qualify for fee waivers for things like the SATS and college applications. But once you pay for something, they’re going to keep making you pay for things. So, when you take the ACT/SAT/whatever test, ask for a fee waiver. Fill out the application. Send it back. If they deny it, appeal it. If they deny it again, scrounge up the cash somewhere. If they approve it, hang onto it, because it’s your golden ticket. By qualifying for a fee waiver on the SAT, you pretty much automatically qualify for fee waivers on college applications, which can be over $100 these days for the pricier schools.

If you don’t qualify for an SAT fee waiver, it’s still worth it to take the time to apply for fee waivers for your college applications. Getting fee waivers doesn’t just save you money, it sets you up for getting more financial aid, because once you get a fee waiver, you end up in a little magical pile of “needy students,” and the financial aid department pays attention to you. And let me tell you something: a lot of private schools have a lot of money they need to give away, so you just need to put your hand out. In fact, private schools are often cheaper than public ones, as long as you pick a school with a big endowment. (Which is not to say that you should pick colleges to apply to on the basis of their endowments, it’s just something to be aware of.)

If you want lots of money, you should also plan on doing well in school. While grades are largely bullshit, they are used as a cutoff for tons of money. Get a high GPA, access lots of money, and that’s just the way it works. Get a low GPA, miss out. While you’re at it, rack up some extracurricular activities to beef up your college and scholarship applications. Interview panels love it when you tell them about how you hand-fed orphaned kittens in a storm for three days, and their pocketbooks will fall open like the, uh, gateway to money. Or something.

As you file college applications, take the time to research financial aid at your prospective colleges. Make a list of deadlines for all financial aid materials. Be prepared to fill out applications for financial aid before you have gotten an acceptance, because the earlier you get financial aid materials in, the better-off you will be. Filing deadlines are often alarmingly early, so do not delay!

Here are some of the ways you can get money:

1. College-based financial aid programs. Most colleges offer financial aid in the form of grants to needy students, along with merit-based scholarships. Often, you are automatically entered for these when you apply, but take the time to double-check.

2. The FAFSA. The Free Application for Federal Student Aid is your friend. Fill it out. It makes you eligible for things like Pell Grants, along with government-issued student loans. While you’re at it, check out state programs like the Cal Grant program.

3. College-based scholarship programs. Both private and public schools have scholarships that are open just to their students. Some of them get really obscure. Are you a Greek-Swedish trumpet player? There might be a scholarship for you. If you’re the first person in your family to go to college, you are eligible for all kinds of financial love. Likewise with LGBT/disadvantaged/minority students, because there are people who have been where you are, and they want to help you with lots of their delicious delicious money. Most colleges kindly maintain a list of scholarships open to their students, along with the basic qualifications. Apply for every one you even vaguely qualify for.

4. Community-based scholarships. Most communities offer scholarships from organizations like the Rotary Club, Lions, etc. Your high school guidance counselor probably keeps a list in the office. Apply for everything. A community-based scholarship paid for my plane ticket to [East Coast College]. Without their help, it’s unlikely I would have even made it to college. One advantage of a lot of community scholarships is that they often come in the form of cash under the table, which means that they will not affect your financial aid award.

5. Generic scholarship searches. Google “college scholarships” and you are going to find a HUGE list of sites that maintain lists of scholarships, including some very juicy government ones.

6. Family members. Milk them.

So, you’ve applied to college, been accepted, and you’ve applied for a bunch of financial assistance, and you’re waiting to hear back. The first thing you are probably going to receive is a financial aid award letter from your college.

The award letter should not be mistaken for the 10 Commandments. It is an opening negotiation in what promises to be a long and fruitful relationship. Now, perhaps you will be satisfied with your financial aid award. Maybe they are giving you enough scholarships and grants so that you will not have to take out loans or contribute much. But maybe they aren’t. If you aren’t happy, retaliate. Call the financial aid office, establish a personal connection with someone there, and start appealing. You will be asked to file paperwork. File it. Keep that personal connection going. Make sure to address all correspondence to that person, and get his or her extension so that you can talk to that person every time you call. If you live close enough to the college, go into the office. Putting a human face on your desire for money will soften their attitude considerably. And remember to be very nice to every single person you talk to on the phone or in the office, because you never know who might have authority in a college. Establishing a good relationship with secretarial staff and the registrar will pay off, not just in a financial aid sense, but in a getting through college sense. (More on that later as well.) Also, being nice just makes you a better person, so do it. Because I say so.

As information about additional grants and scholarships comes in, your award letter will be adjusted. Sometimes things go kerflooey in the office, and the letter gets adjusted to some bizarre original baseline. Do not panic. Call “your person” and straighten the situation out. Things will work out, I promise.

If you’ve applied to multiple colleges and gotten multiple letters, don’t be afraid to play them off each other. Especially if you are a high-performing student, those schools want you, and they will fight to get you. Get the schools to up the ante, exactly like greedy used-car salesmen, and you might end up with a very neat little financial aid award, especially once it is supplemented by all those external scholarships you applied for.

Some final words on paying for college:

1. Do not panic if you have to take out student loans. Student loans are harder to get than they used to be, and the interest rate is higher than my deliciously sinful 1.25%, but they are still not the same as other kinds of debt. Lenders tend to be extremely forgiving, with very generous repayment terms, and the interest rate is way lower than that for other kinds of debt. Secured student loans, in which the government pays the interest as long as you are in school, are often available, so if you have to get loans, try to go for those. If you can’t get those, you might want to consider paying off the interest while you are in school so that it doesn’t compound and cause your total loan amount to be really large when you graduate. Plus, student loan interest payments are tax deductible! Also, while an amount like, say, $17,000 might seem like a lot today, it’s not going to be a big deal when you’re paying it off over the course of many years, and, thanks to inflation, it will be even easier to pay off!

If you end up with a lender who is not so friendly, consolidate your student loans with a lender who is. When you do consolidate student loans, be careful. Predatory lending is still out there, so make sure to read the fine print about the terms, and if you aren’t familiar with financial jargon, find someone who is and ask them to look for the loopholes. If a consolidation package sounds too good to be true, it probably is. Your best bet in terms of lenders is usually a federal or state-based agency, like the Vermont Student Assistance Corporation, the company which handles my student loans now that I have finished paying off the hateful William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan Program (which refused to sell my loans to VSAC when I consolidated).

If you’re fortunate, you will get a cool lender like VSAC from the start. If you’re not, shop around, and try to consolidate with a lender who will lock in an interest rate, and set up graduated payments which start small, and get larger. And remember to deduct that interest! The idea is that when you’ve just graduated, you don’t have a lot of money to throw at loans, but once you start making money, you will, so you can set up the bulk of your balance to come due when you’re more prepared to pay it. Small lenders are usually better, because they will give you personalized service, and, again, it’s good to establish a friendly contact you can talk to when you have problems or questions.

How forgiving are student lenders? Extremely. As long as you stay in touch and try in good faith to pay your loans, they will leave you alone. As long as you are in school, they are never going to ask you for money. Most won’t report you to a credit agency for non-payment for at least three months. This is not to say that you shouldn’t pay off your student loans: student lenders are totally comfortable being patient, because student loan debt will not be erased if you declare bankruptcy. I’m just saying that it’s not the kind of debt you need to be worried about, which brings me to my second and final point:

2. Do not take out a credit card. If you really want to build your credit, get a secured credit card linked to a real bank account. Credit cards are going to be thrown at you (yes, even in this economy) when you arrive on campus: ignore them. You really, really, really do not want a credit card. Ok?

Now, go get cracking on the beginnings of those college applications, and start asking for letters of recommendation if you haven’t already. I’ll be talking about the process of applying to college in the near future. (Why financial aid before college? Because I want to convince people that they can afford college before I bother delving into the depths of college applications.)

Book 281: Matilda

I felt like reading a kid book last night, and no one stopped me. Matilda is actually not my favourite of Dahl’s children’s books. I mean I think it’s good, but I have never been as into it as I have been into books like Danny the Champion of the World, Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, and The Witches. I’m not quite sure why that is.

After all, the story of Matilda closely mirrors that of other Dahl books. We have an extremely impoverished character (Miss Honey), a talented child (Matilda), an evil schoolmistress (Miss Trunchbull), clueless adults (Matilda’s parents), and a mentoring adult figure (the librarian). An unjust situation arises, and Matilda realizes that she has the talent to confront and neutralize that situation, so she does. Classic Dahl.

And I do like the story of Matilda’s revenge on her parents. (One might even say that it gave me a few ideas as a child.) I wonder, somewhat guiltily, if I like the book less because the protagonist is female, rather than male. Most of Dahl’s other books revolve around little boys, not little girls, and I wonder how I would respond if the hero of the book was a boy, and what that says about me. Perhaps I like it less because the protagonist isn’t poor, although I actually really enjoy the descriptions of Matilda’s home life, illustrating the perils of middle class life. Every time I finish this book, I wrestle with why it is that I respond to it so lukewarmly.

I wonder if other Dahl fans have some thoughts on the matter.

Demographics:

Matilda, by Roald Dahl. Published 1988, 240 pages. Fiction.